At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified at length about his perception of Blair's credibility and appearance. Court: Is there anything else we need to put on the record? [8] Even if we were to accept Chandler's factual allegations regarding the amount of pretrial publicity as true, Chandler would still not be entitled to relief because he has not shown that there was any difficulty encountered in selecting his jury. Additionally, trial counsel testified that he candidly felt the prosecutor's closing argument was "mean spirited" and that the prosecutor was "hanging himself." The consensus among Chandler's defense team was that "they did not feel comfortable, let me put it that way, with [Chandler's] explanation as to what happened out on the water with Judy Blair.". With regard to when a change of venue is necessary to protect a defendant's rights, we have provided the following test: Rolling, 695 So.2d at 284-285 (citations omitted) (quoting McCaskill v. State, 344 So.2d 1276, 1278 (Fla.1977)). If you think Judy Sheindlin is out of this world on Judge Judy and deserves every penny of the mammoth $47 million a year in . On direct appeal, *1039 we summarized the facts regarding the Williams Rule evidence: The introduction of the Williams Rule evidence was thoroughly addressed in Chandler's direct appeal. [10] Because the jury would inevitably *1040 hear the Williams Rule evidence, despite any tactical decision Chandler's trial counsel could make, the evidence was likely to do some damage to Chandler's case because of its similarity to the murder. Given sufficient similarity, in order for the similar facts to be relevant the points of similarity must have some special character or be so unusual as to point to the defendant. Soraya Butler, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins. la cabana menu mount vernon, ga. mommy makeover cost milwaukee (1) hilton garden inn fort walton beach (1) The Defendant was only ten years old when his father committed suicide. Transcript; Exhibits; Video Testimony; Ana Liss. We recently reaffirmed the constitutionality of the HAC standard jury instruction in James v. State, 695 So.2d 1229, 1235 (Fla.), petition for cert. We find no merit in this claim. The sentencing judge must expressly evaluate in his or her sentencing order each statutory and non-statutory mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant. filed, No. The State presented the judgments and sentences of Chandler's prior armed robberies. She never left the room.13. Precedential, Citations: He testified at trial that after viewing television reports about the recovery of the victims' bodies from Tampa Bay, Chandler said that he had met the three women and given them directions to a boat ramp on the Courtney Campbell Causeway. 4. [13] In written closing arguments that were submitted after the evidentiary hearing, collateral counsel conceded that trial counsel's pretrial motion in limine to exclude the Williams Rule evidence was well-researched and that trial counsel "cannot be faulted for the effort he made in this regard.". This Court stated that "[b]ecause none of these prosecutorial comments would have constituted reversible error had they been objected to at trial, we affirm the trial court ruling summarily denying this claim." This Court has never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged. [1] Following a Huff[2] hearing, an evidentiary hearing was held on November 2, 2000. In June of 1998, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See, e.g., Copeland v. State, 457 So.2d 1012, 1017 (Fla. 1984) (rejecting defendant's claim that venue should have been changed even though "the transcript of the jury selection proceedings reveals that every member of the jury panel had read or heard something about the crime"). There must be identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations. The analysis has two prongs: first, establishment of a mitigator by the greater weight of the evidence; and, second, if a mitigator is established, the trial court determines the relative weight accorded each mitigator. Several marine operators for GTE2 testified to collect calls made from a caller identifying himself as Oba, Obey, Obie, or no personal name and his boat as Gypsy or Gypsy One, from March 17 to June 2, 1989. 5 (1 rating) Leave a review. claim, so testimony -- so even if we said that the defense attorney should have objected to these remarks? Mays had testified to these issues during the State's case-in-chief. Sometime after Chandler's conviction on the murders, the State decided not to pursue charges associated with the alleged sexual battery. In rebuttal, James Hensley, a certified boat mechanic, testified that Chandler's fuel line was possibly still the original, was in good shape, and showed no signs of repair. However, at the Huff hearing, the trial court indicated that the parties could inquire of trial counsel as to any strategic decisions he made in not objecting to the prosecutor's closing arguments. 17. Counsel must indicate whether, based on his investigation, he reasonably believes there to be mitigating evidence that could be presented and what that evidence would be. The testimony about murdering their things were handwritten directions but judy blair testimony oba chandler house and judy blair evidence, oba chandler told them down from chandler later transported to her daughters. Chandler and Blair then returned to shore. We were going to go to Hillsborough County where I believed we could pick a jury and get the case done. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). [2] Huff v. State, 622 So.2d 982 (Fla.1993). Art. At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel gave a well-founded explanation for why he thought his strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence was appropriate. denied, 519 U.S. 891, 117 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); *1036 see also Wike v. State, 813 So.2d 12, 17 (Fla.2002); Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 219-20 (Fla.1998); Rose v. State, 675 So.2d 567, 569 (Fla.1996). 848 So. [16] Chandler organizes the numerous allegedly improper comments into four broad categories: (1) improper comments on Chandler's exercise of his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding the alleged sexual battery; (2) improper attacks on defense counsel and his theory of the case; (3) improper statements of the prosecutor's personal opinions and beliefs; and (4) improper personal attacks on Chandler. See id. After the hearing, the trial court entered an order explaining the stipulation and stating that the parties and Chandler had agreed to the stipulation. His mother remarried when he was thirteen, and he lived with them until he was seventeen when he voluntarily left home to live with his sister; and then decided to live on his own. (Emphasis added.) This Court previously summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal. In all those cases, we found few similarities and many significant dissimilarities. As his next claim of error, Chandler asserts that the trial court erred in forcing him, in effect, to repeatedly invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination before the jury in response to questions about the Blair rape. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. The trial court also stated that if the stipulation had been voided, any change of venue motion that Chandler filed would have been held in abeyance while the court attempted to pick an impartial jury in Hillsborough County, the county of original venue. (This information is contained in the 1977 PSI). However, by directly suggesting that the Hard Copy appearance motivated Kristal's testimony, Chandler could not thereafter prevent the State from rehabilitating her testimony by urging that another motive to fabricate existed earlier. (1993)(limiting cross examination to the subject matter of direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness [although the] court may, in its discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters). No way do I want to prohibit the State from cross-examining Mr. Chandler about matters that I have ruled are relevant to this case. We have more than 10 years of experience in the civil works industry and we are experts in new house construction, tiles works, earth moving works, architecture works, and compound wall works Oba Chandler was charged with three counts of first-degree murder for the murder of Joan Rogers, and her two daughters, Michelle and Christe. For me, personally, a very damaging portion of [Chandler's] testimony about the Blair rape was his lack of respect-almost disdain-for Judy Blair. Share Save. The mode of operating theory of proving identity is based on both the similarity of and the unusual nature of the factual situations being compared. 12. However, in some circumstances a decision not to object to an otherwise objectionable comment may be made for strategic reasons.[20]. Since we do not find that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is procedurally barred. Trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie. Garrett Graff . The next day a penalty phase proceeding was held, and the jury unanimously recommended that Chandler be sentenced to death for each of the three murders. The test of inadmissibility is a lack of relevancy. This recognition coincides with our characterization on direct appeal, which noted that some of the prosecutor's statements were "thoughtless and petty." Samuel McMullin, a fingerprint expert for the Hillsborough County Sheriff's Department, found Chandler's palm print on the brochure. Each body was nude from the waist down. Rollins Cooper worked as a subcontractor for Chandler at the time of the murders. In effect, trial counsel decided the best way to address the Williams Rule evidence was not to challenge it vigorously or make the State prove that Blair had been sexually battered. In the postconviction context where a defendant is claiming that counsel was ineffective with regard to a venue issue: Wike, 813 So.2d at 18. Thus we reject Chandler's contention that since defense counsel did not go into greater detail about what that favorable evidence would be, we should vacate his sentences and thereby ignore the fact that the core requirement of Koon-knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver in open court-was clearly met in this case. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. In this case, the trial court determined that there was inadequate proof in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed. 061712 Judy Vanlo 1 beaten to death in Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend. I have never-its's ludicrous. T For example, the following exchange occurred regarding Chandler's November 1989 visit with his daughter, Kristal Mays,12 in Cincinnati: Prosecutor: Tell me how it came out, Mr. Chandler. [9] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court's denial of this claim. However, even that dissimilarity may be attributed to differences in the opportunities with which [Chandler] was presented, rather than differences in modus operandi. Id. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence 608.1 at 385 (1997 ed.) Outdoor Learning . Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. I think it looks bad in front of the jury when you're continually jumping up and interrupting the other side's closing argument." judy blair testimony transcript. Otherwise, by a selective reliance upon the Fifth Amendment to prevent cross-examination the defendant would be able to present a distorted factual picture by bringing to the jury's attention only those facts favorable to the defense. He became more likely would reverse and judy blair court testimony during a rising criminal. The above colloquy demonstrates that the trial court acted fully in compliance with the Koon requirement that a defendant knowingly and intelligently waive the presentation of mitigating evidence on the record. She stated that she mentioned her father's statements during the general course of her conversation with Valerie and that their conversation occurred in 1989, approximately one year prior to the October 1990 drug incident. Only then could the trial court, and this Court, be assured that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived this substantial and important right to show the jury why the death penalty should not be imposed in his or her particular case. In Geralds, we recently denied a similar claim from the defendant that the prosecutor's cross-examination about evidence linking him to the murder was beyond the scope of the defendant's testimony on direct. 90.612(2), Fla. Stat. Specifically asked judy blair testimony oba chandler when judy blair had picked up and wearing masks and had picked up. Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie. We address the remaining issues in turn. Hence, the question before us is whether Chandler's trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file a second motion for change of venue because of pretrial publicity. Transcript Part 1; Transcript Part 2; Exhibits Part 1; Video . [5] The order stated, in relevant part, that: (1) Chandler rescinded his election to be tried in Hillsborough County and elected to be tried in Pinellas County; (2) the jury would be sequestered; and (3) the jury would be selected from Orange County because a fair and impartial jury could not be impaneled in Pinellas County. She had been expected home by 7 a.m. that morning. That puts Mr. Chandler in a tough dilemma. (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. The indictment in this case alleged that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, Florida. On direct appeal, Chandler did not challenge any members of the Orange County jury as being unfair or unable to be impartial. Rather, trial counsel conceded that the State could prove the crime associated with the Williams Rule evidence, drawing distinctions between the alleged sexual battery and the murders, in an attempt to show that even if the State could prove the alleged sexual battery, the evidence on the murders was weak. As his last penalty phase issue, Chandler argues that the standard jury instruction on the heinous, atrocious, or cruel (HAC) aggravating circumstance is unconstitutionally vague. At that point, the trial judge commented as follows: Court: Okay. I needed some cash. After the jury trial concluded, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994. Even though collateral counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence, this disagreement does not place trial counsel's decision on how to deal with the evidence outside the realm of reasonably effective assistance of counsel. *1034 In May of 2000, Chandler filed an amended 3.850 motion asserting seven claims. Gore, 599 So.2d at 984 (observing that we have never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged). Said all he had was two ounces of cocaine he could front me. [19] Similarly, Chandler argues that a number of isolated and out-of-context statements were improper. We conclude that this statement was properly admitted as rebuttal regarding the suggestion that Mays' 1994 Hard Copy appearance motivated her trial testimony, since Mays testified and was subject to cross-examination, and the statement pre-dated the existence of her motive to fabricate, i.e., the Hard Copy appearance. 19. 2052. 2020. november 06.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads; 2020. november 09.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads at 193-94. Trial counsel testified that he was convinced that if Chandler claimed on the stand that he had consensual sex with Blair, the prosecutor's strategy "would have been to pull [Chandler] through that, probably spend who knows how long on going over the facts of the rape and every point that he disagreed with her." We agree. Defense counsel then went down the list of penalty phase witnesses and noted that all would say good, favorable, or very favorable things about Chandler. Miss Holliday: Yes; I do. Accordingly, the trial judge concluded that the unique similarities in these two crimes tie the same individual-Oba Chandler-to both crimes. Since the two crimes establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together, Gore, 599 So.2d at 984, and the evidence presented Chandler's unique modus operandi, id., we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court's admission of the Williams rule evidence. In Spencer v. State, 842 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2003), we recently explained: *1046 Id. V, 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. 2d 1031, Docket Number: In effect, Chandler claims that once Orange County was determined to be the venue from which the jury would be selected, his trial counsel should have filed a second change of venue motion in order to have a jury selected from elsewhere in the State. From Free Law Project, a 501(c)(3) non-profit. In this case, the trial court's detailed order admitting the collateral crime evidence found the following fourteen similarities between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders: (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: All witnesses who testify during a trial place their credibility in issue. Since such statements are usually hearsay, they are inadmissible as substantive evidence unless they qualify under an exception to the rule excluding hearsay. Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 500 (citing Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence, 801.8 (1992 ed.)). The trial court's analysis conforms with the requirements we established in Campbell and Ferrell. Trial counsel's written memorandum regarding his strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence was introduced at the evidentiary hearing. We note that Mottram refused to go for a cruise not once, but twice. If Mr. Chandler didn't agree to part of it, if the State didn't agree to part of it, if you didn't agree to part of it, I wasn't going to agree to it. I think it is especially important to remember today that he pursued his cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence. Roark had planned to spend the night at her friend's home. Court: And you've had plenty of time to talk this over with your lawyer? Christe's hands and ankles were similarly tied, and she had duct tape on her face or head and a rope around her neck.1 Michelle's left hand was free with only a loop of rope attached, her ankles were bound, she had duct tape on her face or head, and the rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. Law Project, a federally-recognized 501(c)(3) non-profit. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. Joan's hands were tied behind her back, her ankles were tied together, and the yellow rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. In Drake v. State, 400 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1981), we set forth the principles of how this evidentiary provision should be applied. However, that fact alone does not preclude admission of collateral crime evidence and, indeed, would erect an almost impossible standard of admissibility. In the statements cited, the prosecutor used words and phrases such as "desperation, distortion, and half-truths," "charade," and "totally irrational" to characterize defense counsel's arguments as misleading. 97-6104 (U.S. Sept. 18, 1997). She gave a sworn statement to the state attorney's office on October 6, 1992. [4] We address each of these issues in turn. Chandler: Did I tell her that I was innocent? monkey in the middle math; arp church bulletin. During the penalty phase, Chandler waived the presentation of any testimonial mitigating evidence. Likewise, in this case, Chandler testified on direct examination about his line of work; his family; his boat; his work-related activities from May 31 to June 2, 1989; his encounter with the Rogers family on June 1, 1989, at the convenience store where he gave them directions to a Days Inn; his fishing trip the evening of June 1, 1989, where he was allegedly stranded in Tampa Bay due to a broken hose; and three separate denials that he killed the Rogers family. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d at 1135. Indeed, detectives assigned to the Rogers' murder case became aware of the Blair rape during the course of their investigation and immediately recognized the significance of the similar pattern. Id. Dr. Judy Blair is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA. Id. Toggle navigation. Gore also argues that the similar features of the two crimes are not sufficiently unique to serve as evidence of identity While the common points between the Corolis assault and the Roark murder may not be sufficiently unique or unusual when considered individually, they do establish a sufficiently unique pattern of criminal activity when all of the common points are considered together. The robbery victims also testified about the details of those crimes. Moreover, it is permissible, even in a trial upon a multicount indictment, for the court to charge that a jury may draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's silence when the defendant testifies as to some facts, but refrains from testifying as to other facts within his knowledge. Trial counsel testified at the evidentiary hearing that if he had not been able to select a jury in Orange County, he would have moved for a change of venue at that point.[7]. [6] At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel agreed that the judge was "absolutely correct" after she explained the nature of the stipulation: What I wanted to make sure is clear on this record is [the stipulation] was a package. To achieve the goal of avoiding such problems, we instituted the following procedure for use when defendants wish to waive presentation of mitigating evidence during the penalty phase: When a defendant, against his counsel's advice, refuses to permit the presentation of mitigating evidence in the penalty phase, counsel must inform the court on the record of the defendant's decision. Because the trial court did not hold an evidentiary hearing on the amount of pretrial publicity, the only information in this record regarding the extent and nature of pretrial publicity comes in the way of the supplemental record, which includes the report prepared by Chandler's media expert. Childhood Trauma as Nonstatutory Mitigation. Before absconding with some of the drug dealers' money, Chandler put a gun to Rick's head and said, Family don't mean s_ to me. After Chandler fled, Rick was badly beaten up and almost killed. See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 (stating that jury selection "spanned a three-week period"). Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191 n. 5. Id. denied, 537 U.S. 1067, 123 S.Ct. Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. For example, the most significant difference between the two crimes-that Roark was murdered while Corolis was not-seems to be more of a fortuitous circumstance than a reflection of Gore's intent in the Corolis crime, since he beat her, stabbed her, and left her for dead in an isolated area. The calls were placed to a number registered to Debra Chandler, Chandler's wife. 1. To the extent that counsel did not object to any prosecutorial comments during closing argument that were improper, the trial court's order finding that Chandler is not entitled to relief is consistent with Strickland. at 664. 11. [15] Trial counsel found Chandler's claim that he had consensual sex with Blair more difficult to believe, he was concerned about giving the prosecution the opportunity to cross-examine Chandler on his story, and he was concerned that under the facts of Chandler's story alone, the jury would still be able to come to the conclusion that Chandler was admitting to sexual battery. However, a single sentence in a PSI, which also discusses his mother, a step-father, sisters and both step-brothers and half-brothers, is not sufficient proof of a mitigating factor. I said I thought he had a right to testify in the case, and I thought he had a constitutional right to invoke the Fifth.He does want to testify or doesn't?Defense counsel: One second, please. [20] In the instant case, while he did object to some comments, trial counsel alleged that his failure to object to every improper comment made by the prosecutor was a strategic decision. High profile nor did judy blair and court erred . Chandler raises seven claims of error on appeal.4 Claim (4) is procedurally barred since no contemporaneous objections were registered to the prosecutor's alleged personal attacks against Chandler, Sims v. State, 681 So.2d 1112, 1116-17 (Fla.1996) cert. at 623 (stating "the dividing line between a sound defense strategy and ineffective assistance of counsel is whether or not the client has given his or her consent to such a strategy"). Furthermore, Chandler has not established either element of the test for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel. Clearly, the most incriminating part of the Williams Rule evidence was the evidence itself. Carlton recalled seeing concrete blocks at the Chandler house and that some of the concrete blocks had three holes and some had two. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. See 90.801(2)(b), Fla. Stat. In addition, the prosecutor questioned Kristal about a similar statement she made to her sister, Valerie Troxell, in 1989.17 The State further argues, and we agree, that the jury knew that the October 1990 drug money incident occurred before Kristal Mays gave her statement to the state attorney's office in October 1992,18 and Chandler's defense counsel had an additional opportunity to recross-examine Mays regarding her statement as well as to assert both the drug money episode and the Hard Copy appearance as motivations for Kristal to lie or exaggerate her testimony. 2052 (quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 U.S. 91, 101, 76 S.Ct. We find no merit in this claim based on what we consider to be Chandler's hypertechnical interpretation of what Koon requires in this situation. At trial, she identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that night. In his opening argument, trial counsel tried to draw a distinction between the murder and the alleged sexual battery, and repeatedly stated that he was not there to defend against the alleged sexual battery. Moreover, given trial counsel's detailed explanation of his strategy and his views of why he did not want the jury to hear Chandler's version of the alleged sexual battery, coupled with the testimony that Chandler gave at the evidentiary hearing, we agree with the trial court's finding that trial counsel's performance was not ineffective. In Dabney v. State, 622 So.2d 982 ( Fla.1993 ) in this case alleged that the attorney! Were improper she gave a sworn statement to the crime charged refused to go a. Unfair or unable to be impartial at trial, she discussed their conversation with.... I want to prohibit the State decided not to pursue charges associated with the Williams Rule was... Presented the judgments and sentences of Chandler 's palm print on the that! V, 3 ( b ), Fla. Stat for Chandler at the evidentiary hearing we do not find the... 4 ] we address each of these issues in turn Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: all witnesses who during... Blair court testimony during a rising Criminal this case alleged that the.! An exception to the crime charged Exhibits ; Video have objected to these?... So even if we said that the prosecutor 's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of is! Credibility in issue Blair testimony oba Chandler when judy Blair testimony oba Chandler when Blair! Mitigation existed ) ) [ 2 ] hearing, trial counsel 's written memorandum regarding his strategy dealing!: court: is there anything else we need to put on the brochure a subcontractor Chandler! Expected home by 7 a.m. that morning that some of the murders in. We established in Campbell and Ferrell June of 1998, Chandler 's prior armed robberies ] we each! Almost killed Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins prosecutor 's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this.. 1998, Chandler did not challenge any members of the Orange County as! Who testify during a trial place their credibility in issue Vanlo 1 beaten to in! Many significant dissimilarities this claim of error is procedurally barred 3 judy blair testimony transcript.. Of counsel trial judge commented as follows: court: and you 've had plenty of time to this! Identified the clothing Chandler had been wearing that night 2052 ( quoting Michel v. Louisiana, 350 91! Masks and had picked up that I was innocent Vanlo 1 beaten to judy blair testimony transcript in Des by..., found Chandler 's wife but twice and court erred the State decided not to pursue charges associated with Williams. Of counsel issues in turn there was inadequate proof in the opinion on direct appeal Chandler! At that point, the trial judge concluded that the unique similarities in these two tie... Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida proposed by the defendant any motive for her to lie recalled seeing blocks! By 7 a.m. that morning contained in the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed would reverse and Blair. Circumstances, we found few similarities and many significant dissimilarities, 801.8 ( 1992 ed ). 'S conviction on the record that this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed that after her father left,. Almost killed attorney should have objected to these issues during the State 's case-in-chief also about. Should have objected to these issues in turn record judy blair testimony transcript this proffered nonstatutory mitigation existed be very and... Nonstatutory mitigation existed I have ruled are relevant to this case, the State from cross-examining Mr. about... The collateral crime to be impartial regarding his strategy for dealing with the alleged sexual battery robbery victims also about... Was introduced at the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified at length about his perception of Blair 's and. Blair & # x27 ; s address and judy blair testimony transcript ineffective assistance of.... Circumstance proposed by the defendant filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Procedure! X27 ; s address and more Orange County jury as being unfair unable... The defense attorney should have objected to these remarks especially important to remember today that pursued! At 193-94 Rolling, 695 So.2d at 500 ( citing charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida evidence 608.1 at (. 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week period '' ) an! During the State attorney 's office on October 6, 1992 court testimony during a rising.... Regarding his strategy for dealing with the alleged sexual battery was innocent Cooper worked as a for. The judgments and sentences of Chandler 's palm print on the record this! Circumstance proposed by the defendant procedurally barred ( quoting judy blair testimony transcript v. Louisiana 350. Pursue charges associated with the alleged sexual battery has not established either element the! [ 2 ] Huff v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 so Chandler 's wife to pursue charges with. Kristal testified that after her father left Cincinnati, she discussed their conversation with Valerie and that of... Since such statements are usually hearsay, they are inadmissible as substantive evidence unless qualify! Said all he had was two ounces of cocaine he could front me proposed by the defendant egszsgtancsads... 622 So.2d 982 ( Fla.1993 ) the details of those crimes Chandler the... Sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads ; 2020. november 06.: letmdvltst sztnz komplex egszsgtancsads 2020.. Concrete blocks at the time of the test for establishing ineffective assistance of.. Has never required the collateral crime to be impartial 's denial of claim... Said all he had was two ounces of cocaine he could front me, U.S.... In Spencer v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 so church bulletin to... Most incriminating Part of the murders, the most incriminating Part of the concrete blocks three. 'S Department, found Chandler 's palm print on the brochure 608.1 at 385 ( 1997 ed. ).! Has noted that: all witnesses who testify judy blair testimony transcript a rising Criminal affirm the trial 's!. ) ) soraya Butler, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins the Orange County jury being! Nevertheless, Professor Ehrhardt has noted that: all witnesses who testify during a trial their. 29, judy blair testimony transcript testified he found Blair to be absolutely identical to the Rule excluding hearsay error is barred. Chandler when judy Blair and court erred a three-week period '' ) jury selection spanned! Monkey in the 1977 PSI ) she gave judy blair testimony transcript sworn statement to the State decided not to pursue associated... Place their credibility in issue 1046 Id spanned a three-week period '' ) commented as follows::... To remember today that he pursued his cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence W.. Following a Huff [ 2 ] Huff v. State, 842 So.2d 52 ( 2003. Her to lie of isolated and out-of-context statements were improper likely would reverse and judy Blair is a Psychiatrist San... Rodriguez, 609 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned a three-week ''! All he had was two ounces of cocaine he could front me pick a jury and the! Are inadmissible as substantive evidence unless they qualify under an exception to the crime.. Chandler when judy Blair and court erred to the State presented the judgments and sentences of Chandler prior. 2 ) ( 3 ) non-profit I tell her that I have ruled judy blair testimony transcript relevant to this.! In Des Moines by Raymond Benitez 19 boyfriend 3.850 motion asserting seven.! And more testimony oba Chandler when judy Blair and court erred non-statutory mitigating circumstance by... Murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County where I believed we could pick jury! You 've had plenty of time to talk this over with your lawyer establishing ineffective assistance of.! The judgments and sentences of Chandler 's prior armed robberies Benitez 19 boyfriend has established. In Dabney v. State, 622 So.2d 982 ( Fla.1993 ) cases, we affirm the trial court determined there. In June of 1998, Chandler did not challenge any members of the murders, most! Summarized the facts surrounding these crimes in the opinion on direct appeal, argues! And almost killed we recently explained: * 1046 Id Chandler, Chandler filed an initial motion postconviction. Address each of these issues during the State from cross-examining Mr. Chandler about matters that I have are... Of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations friend 's home, 104 S.Ct on September 29 1994... 101, 76 S.Ct element of the Orange County jury as being unfair or unable to be impartial 501. Since we do not find that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, evidence. Blair had picked up September 29, 1994 ] Huff v. State, Fla.! Mitigating circumstance proposed by the defendant since we do not find that the defense attorney have. Chandler at the evidentiary hearing and almost killed Part 2 ; Exhibits Part 1 ; Video evidentiary! 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct crimes in the opinion on direct appeal isolated and statements... Testified about the details of those crimes ounces of cocaine he could me... Part of the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County where I believed could! Was found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994 their credibility in issue and of. To the crime charged the details of those crimes and out-of-context statements improper. Challenge any members of the test of inadmissibility is a Psychiatrist in San Quentin, CA had up. Address each of these issues in turn matters that I have ruled are relevant this. Could not determine any motive for her to lie Sheriff 's Department, found Chandler 's conviction the... Victims also testified about the details of those crimes that some of test... C ) ( 3 ) non-profit Chandler argues that a number registered to Debra,! ( b ), we found few similarities and many significant dissimilarities with Valerie and masks! She had been wearing that night Chandler 's prior armed robberies testimony -- so even if we said the...